| return to : MA Projects | Title Page |
|
Strategy
Paper The Association's strategy should be to pressure the Thai
government and encourage allies to press the Australian government to
re-assess existing temperature/time parameters for the treatment of
cooked chicken meat. To achieve this objective, the Association should
pursue a strategy that will mobilize support from stakeholders in
Thailand, in Australia and elsewhere. Domestic
Strategy Objective. The Association's primary objective in pursuing the domestic strategy is
to ensure that the Thai government will give this issue higher priority
than it has to date. Given the relatively small size of the Australian
market for Thai cooked chicken and the greater urgency of other
bilateral issues, this issue has not yet been placed high on the Thai
government’s agenda. Action plan. Establish
a coalition with other domestic stakeholders. The
Thai Chicken Growers Association and the Thai Feed Mill Association are
likely to support efforts to open the Australian chicken meat market
because they will benefit from an expanded market. Letters should be
sent to them, proposing the formation of a coalition that will lobby the
Thai Government and Parliament. Coordinated lobbying efforts will draw
greater attention and carry more weight than the Association’s lone
voice. Raise
the profile of the issue on the national export agenda. The
Association should write to the Board of Trade of Thailand to request
that it raise the issue before Export Development Committee. This will
give a sense of urgency to the issue. Generate
awareness of the urgency of this issue in Parliament. In
order to push the Thai government to resolve the issue swiftly, the
Association should communicate to Parliament the importance and urgency
of the issue for the Thai chicken industry. To secure Parliamentarian
support, the Association will write letters to the Senate Committee on
Foreign Affairs and Trade and the House Committee on Agriculture and
meet with key Committee members to seek their support. Encourage
the Thai government to exert more pressure on the Australian government.
Although
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs usually leads the Thai government in its
discussions with the Australian government, the Association should also
maintain contact with the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of
Agriculture and Cooperatives. With WTO-related trade negotiations under
its purview, the Ministry of Commerce will play an important role if the
issue is to be taken to the WTO for dispute settlement. The Livestock
Department of the Agriculture Ministry will provide relevant information
about epidemiological surveillance and veterinary inspection in Thailand
in support of the Thai positions in the WTO. Therefore, the Association
should write to these Ministries to acknowledge progress made to date,
encourage them to press Australia even further and share our ideas for
approaching negotiations with Australia (see Negotiation Strategy
Paper). Secure
support from Australian-Thai Chamber of Commerce. The
Association should also write a letter to solicit support from the
Australian-Thai Chamber of Commerce in Bangkok. By emphasizing how the
issue can affect bilateral trade between Thailand and Australia, the
Association will be able to encourage the Chamber to urge the Australian
government to reach agreement with the Thai government on this problem.
Australian
Strategy Objective. Australian domestic support
from those who will benefit from the import will create pressure to
counter a call for protection from Australian domestic chicken
producers. Action Plan. Build
alliances in Australia. Fast food chains such as KFC and McDonald’s
and big supermarket chains such as Coles, Woolworth and Safeway are
potential allies in Australia. The fast food chains may be interested in
sourcing cheap precooked chicken meat from Thailand, while supermarkets
may be interested in importing Thai chicken products to satisfy their
lower-income customers. The Association should write letters to solicit
their support. Reassure
opponents of the import as well as the Australian public that Thailand’s
risk management program for processed chicken is effective.
The
Association must bolster public confidence in the quality of Thailand’s
chicken products. To achieve this objective, the media strategy will be
employed (see Media Strategy Paper). International
Strategy Objective. International pressure will help prompt the Australian
government to find a swift and satisfactory solution to the problem.
Therefore, the Association should work to mobilize support in the United
States and Denmark, as well as in Australia. Action
Plan. Align
with the USA Poultry and Egg Export Council and the Danish Poultry
Exporters Association. Although we will compete with U.S. and Danish exporters in
the Australian market once it is opened, a quick resolution of the issue
is of more immediate concern. We should write letters to ask for their
support on our position and urge them to encourage their respective
governments to coordinate efforts with the Thai government in pressing
Australia for a swift and satisfactory resolution to the problem. Negotiation
Strategy Objective To persuade Australia to revise, based on sound science, the
temperature/time parameters for the treatment of cooked chicken meat.
This will enable exports of Thai cooked chicken to enter the Australian
market and prevent Australia from implementing an unjustifiably
stringent quarantine measure when considering importation of other
poultry products in the future. Allies The Thai government can build a coalition with the U.S. and Danish
governments to negotiate with Australia. These countries’ chicken
exporters are also affected by Australia's stringent requirements. The
USTR expressed concern regarding this issue in the 1997 and 1998
National Trade Estimate report on Australia. Basic
Arguments In negotiations with Australia, Thailand should base its positions
on the following arguments: •
Thailand understands Australia's concern about and recognizes its
sovereign right to prevent the spread of Infectious Bursal Disease
Virus. IBDV could have a long-term economic impact on the Australian
poultry industry and threaten native bird populations in the country. •
The WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement requires risk
assessments to be based on sound scientific principle. It also prohibits
discrimination between domestic and foreign products if the same disease
conditions exist in the importing country and exporting countries.
Australia’s quarantine measure is inconsistent with the Agreement
because: •
Each of the various scientific approaches Australia relied on in
determining risk was faulty. Although the temperature/time parameters
required for the inactivation of IBDV were derived from scientific
results, the use of IBDV strain CS 88 in the test was not justified by
objective evidence. So far, there is no evidence that this very virulent
strain of IBDV is prevalent in Thailand. • AQIS failed to assess the possible
existence of disease-free areas and areas of low-disease prevalence in
Thailand. IBDV or some strains of the disease may be limited only to one
or more specific geographical areas in Thailand. Therefore, chicken
products coming from IBDV-free areas within Thailand should be
considered on the basis of their disease status, not that of the rest of
the country. • The proposed cooking regime does not
apply to domestic producers despite the occurrence of IBDV in Australia
in 1997 as reported in the OIE yearbook. Thus, because disease
conditions in Thailand and Australia are similar, chicken products from
the two countries should be treated similarly. Negotiation
Tactics
·
Remind Australia that despite occasional reports of Blue Tongue
disease in Australian cattle, Thailand has allowed imports of Australian
beef because of our confidence in Australia’s system of veterinary
inspection and sanitary certification. There has never been an outbreak
of this disease in Thailand. ·
Reconfirm that if this issue is not resolved, Thailand will suspend
consideration of the Australian requests to export lupin seed and skim
milk to Thailand. Options
·
Invite Australia to send an inspection team to visit the Thai
poultry farms that supply chickens that, after processing, will be
exported to Australia. During an inspection tour of the Australian
delegation in Thailand in 1997, visits were made only to the Thai
processing plants that had applied to export to Australia. ·
Propose that each batch of source birds be placed under quarantine
for one week because chickens infected with IBDV will normally die
within 4-5 days ·
Seek Australia’s recognition for IBDV-free areas in Thailand. ·
Approach the Office International des Epizooties (OIE) to conduct a
study on the strains of IBDV that are endemic in Thailand and Australia
and, based on the OIE study, develop international standards for
verifying the inactivation of IBDV in processed chicken meat. ·
Take the case to the WTO for dispute settlement. Media
Strategy Objectives
•
Given
a general concern about the spread of IBDV into Australia through
imported cooked chicken, the Association must reassure the Australian
general public that epidemiological surveillance and quarantine
inspections undertaken by Thai veterinary authorities are effective and
that quality control programs in Thai processing plants meet
international standards. •
To
help strengthen support for imports within Australia, the Association
must generate public awareness of 1) the negative impacts of trade
barriers to imports of foreign chicken and 2) the benefits Australian
consumers will derive from foreign competition. Action
Plan •
Publish an op-ed piece in influential newspapers in Australia. Although The
Australian claims to be the country’s only truly national
newspaper, the Association should also contact other influential local
newspapers in each of Australia’s six states, the Northern Territory
and in Canberra where federal government policy is made. Target
Newspapers
• The Australian
• The Sydney Morning
Herald and the Daily Telegraph in New South Wales
• The Age and the
Herald Sun in Victoria
• The Courier-Mail
in Queensland
• The Advertiser in
South Australia
• The Times in
Western Australia
• The Mercury in
Tasmania
• Alice Spring News
in North Territory
• The Canberra Times
in Canberra |