|
APPENDIX
D
Background: Hungary’s Parliament
Current
Political Parties with Seats in the Hungarian Parliament
(Since
May 1998)
Name of Party
|
Seats
|
Alliance of
Young Democrats, conservative liberal, FIDESZ-MPP
|
148
|
Hungarian
Socialist Party, socialist, MSZP
|
134
|
|
Independent
Party of Smallholders, Agrarian Workers and Citizens, agrarian
conservative, FKgP
|
48
|
|
Alliance
of Free Democrats, liberal, SZDSZ
|
24
|
Hungarian
Justice and Life Party, nationalist, MIEP
|
14
|
Hungarian
Democratic Forum, conservative/Christian-democratic, MDF
|
17
|
Previous Election Results
Election 1990
(first free election since change of the political system)
Name of Party
|
Total Number of Mandates
|
MDF
|
164
|
|
SZDSZ
|
92
|
|
FKgP
|
44
|
|
MSZP
|
33
|
|
FIDESZ
|
21
|
KDNP
|
21
|
Agrarian
association
|
1
|
Independent
|
6
|
Common
candidate
|
4
|
The government was formed by a MDF
/ FKgP / KDNP coalition.
Election 1994
Name of Party
|
Total Number of Mandates
|
MSZP
|
209
|
|
SZDSZ
|
69
|
|
MDF
|
38
|
|
FKgP
|
26
|
|
KDNP
|
22
|
|
FIDESZ
|
20
|
|
Agrarian
association
|
1
|
|
Common
candidate
|
1
|
The government was
formed by a MSZP / SZDSZ coalition.
APPENDIX
E
Names
of FIDESZ Parliamentary Committee Members
1.
Budgetary and Finance Committee
Mádi,
László, Vice Chairman
Arnóth, Sándor, Member
Babák, Mihály, Member
Balsay, István László, Member
Dr. Hargitai, János, Member
Dr. Kerényi, János, Member
Lenártek, András, Member
Rákos, Tibor, Member
Rogán, Antal, Member
Dr. Rubovszky, György, Member
Tállai, András, Member
1.a.
Sub-Committee for European Integration Affairs
Mádi,
László, Vice Chairman
Lenártek, András, Member
Tállai,
András,
Member
2. Economics
Committee
Dr.
Latorcai, János, Chairman
Balla,
György, Member
Domokos,
László, Member
Dr. Horváth, János, Member
Ivanics, István, Member
Lázár, Mózes, Member
Márton,
Attila, Member
Nógrádi,
László, Member
Rigler, Zoltán, Member
Várkonyi, András, Member
Végh, László, Member
2.a. Sub-Committee for the Implementation of Legislation
and the Monitoring of its Social and Economic Impact
Ivanics,
István, Chairman
Dr. Horváth, János, Member
Nógrádi,
László, Member
Várkonyi,
András, Member
Végh,
László, Member
2.b.
Sub-Committee for European Integration
Dr.
Horváth, János, Chairman
Várkonyi,
András, Member
3.
Constitutional and Justice Committee
Dr.
Rubovszky, György, Vice Chairman
Dr. Szakács, Imre, Vice Chairman
Dr.
Répássy, Róbert, Vice Chairman
Dr. Dorkota, Lajos, Member
Dr. Gyimesi, József, Member
Dr.
Helmeczy, László, Member
Dr.
Juharos, Róbert, Member
Dr. Koczka, Csaba, Member
Kozma,
Péter, Member
Dr. Mátrai, Márta, Member
Dr.
Mikes, Éva, Member
Dr. Salamon, László, Member
Dr. Szabó, Erika, Member
Dr. Répássy, Róbert, Member
Várkonyi,
András, Member
Dr.
Vitányi, István József, Member
3.a.
Sub-Committee for European Integration
Dr.
Vitányi, István József, Chairman
4. Agricultural
Committee
Farkas,
Sándor, Chairman
Bebes,
István, Vice Chairman
Czerván,
György, Member
Dr. Györkös, Péter, Member
Járvás,
István, Member
Dr.
Pap, János, Member
Dr.
Szabó, József Andor, Member
Szabó,
Ferenc, Member
Tóth,
András, Member
4.a.
Sub-Committee for EU Accession and Foreign Trade
Glattfelder,
Béla, Chairman
Bebes,
István, Member
Dr.
Szabó, József Andor, Member
APPENDIX
F
Official Public
Relations Strategy
In
April 1995, the Inter-Ministerial Committee for European Integration
approved a governmental campaign to prepare the public for European
Union accession. The campaign design was based on survey results that
mapped Hungarian public attitudes towards and general knowledge of EU
accession.
The
campaign started in January 1996 and has been funded from two sources:
the central budget and EU PHARE. (The Hungarian government provided HUF
214.1 million in 1999; PHARE provided ECU 794,000 in 1997 and 1998.) The
main aim of the campaign is to achieve the popular support necessary to
pass a referendum on EU accession. (The referendum will be held after
accession negotiations are completed.)
The campaign is divided into
three phases. The first,
informational phase lasted until the beginning of the negotiations and
aimed to provide general knowledge of and arouse public interest in the
EU. The second phase is
designed to help people develop informed opinions on accession.
The final phase, which will start at the conclusion of
negotiations, aims to mobilize people to vote “yes” in the accession
referendum.
The
Minister of Foreign Affairs oversees the campaign. The EU Political
Relations Division within the Ministry is responsible for its
coordination (planning, legal and financial management, supervision, and
evaluation). The Ministry
supports concrete ideas and not institutions or organizations.
Proposals must fulfill two distinct criteria. First, they have to target a defined population segment—the
general public, rural society, youth, the teaching community,
journalists, entrepreneurs, etc. Second,
they must possess highly informative content regarding the EU.
Realization of the Campaign
·
The Ministry of
Foreign Affairs has published 17 thematic brochures covering topics of
great importance to the EU and/or Hungary.
It has also provided funding for several other publications.
·
The Ministry has
established cooperative relations with the representatives of regional
and countrywide press outlets and has sent EU attachments for interviews
with a number of newspapers.
·
The Ministry has
also established cooperative relations with many representatives of the
electronic media, including Hungarian National Radio, Hungarian National
Television, and Duna TV.
·
The Ministry
participates regularly in fairs and expositions with its own “Europe
Booths.”
·
During 1999,
nearly 100 informational events were held all over the country.
The Ministry has put emphasis on regional information
distribution. “Europe-Days”
organized by non-governmental organizations have been held throughout
the country. European Information Centers have also been established
regionally.
Land
Privatization Results
Farm Types Before Privatization
Large
scale farms
·
121 state farms
accounted for about 14 percent of all farmland and 15 percent of
agricultural output.
·
1,200
co-operatives accounted for about 80 percent of farmland and 50 percent
of output.
Individual
small plots
·
“Auxiliary”
private farms (mostly part-time operations) accounted for 6 percent of
farmland and 35 percent of output.
Household
farms and state farms/co-operatives maintained highly integrated
production relations.
Farm Types After Privatization
As
a result of privatization, 5.1 million hectares of land have been
allocated to former collective members or privatized through auctions,
and 2.2 million land titles have been distributed.
·
The main types of farms now are corporations,
co-operatives, and private (individual) farms, with private farms
accounting for over half (approximately 57 percent) of total
agricultural output.
·
As compensation
for past expropriations, 2.5 million hectares of land were divided among
600,000 individuals (an average of 4.2 hectares per person).
Many of these individuals do not work in agriculture.
·
As a result of
the first phase of collective farm reorganization, which was completed
in 1995, 2.1 million hectares of former collective farm land were
divided among 1.3 million people (an average of 1.6 hectares per
person). Of the initial assets, 41.4 percent was given to active
collective members, 38.7 percent to previous owners, and 14.4 percent to
former members. Only about 15 percent of collective members left the
collectives, one-third of which created smaller co-operatives or
partnerships. New
co-operatives are still in the process of establishing themselves.
·
Half a million
hectares of state-owned land were divided among 300,000 collective
workers and state employees that did not formerly own land (an average
of 1.7 hectares per person). The
initial phase of state farm privatization was completed in 1996 when
only 28 out of the initial 121 farms (just two percent of farmland)
remained in majority state ownership.
Characteristics of Privatized Land
As
a result of privatization, there are 1.5 million landowners in Hungary
who, on average, own less than five hectares apiece. Hungarian Chamber
of Agriculture data indicate that 11 percent of total arable land is in
plots of less than one hectare each.
Fifty-two percent of total farmland is made up of plots of less
than 10 hectares.
(In the European Union, farms of five hectares or less account
for just six percent of farmland. Those under 10 hectares constitute
just 12 percent.)
Not
only are plot sizes small, but a single owner’s land may be dispersed
over several locations as a result of the compensation process. While 70
percent of newly privatized land remains collectively cultivated,
efficient production is impossible on plots that are too small in size
and where capital is lacking. As noted in a June 1998 Commission Report, “a new category of
full-time commercial private farms” has emerged in Hungary and these
farms—which are approximately 10 hectares in size—are likely to face
difficulties in the near future “due to their limited investment
capacity and the shortcomings of the rural infrastructure.”
top |