1.
White Paper
2.
Sample Letter to JMEA Members
3.
Sample Letter to Legislators
4.
Sample Op-Ed Article
5.
Schedule
6.
Budget
Exhibit 1. White Paper
Deregulation
of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law
White Paper
1. Issue
JMEA urges the Ministry of
Health and Welfare (MHW) to deregulate the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law. This
law was established in 1943 in order to protect and improve public health by regulating medical equipment
quality, effectiveness, and safety. In response to recent wide-ranging
innovations in medical technology and the shortening of medical equipment
life-cycles, the law was amended in June 1994 with the goal of speeding the procedures
for obtaining approval for new medical products.
However, it is
still difficult for the medical equipment industry to introduce new products
because Japan’s approval process for new medical equipment is the longest of
any major developed country. Shortening product approval times will help
Japanese medical manufacturers compete by speeding the introduction of new
cost-effective medical equipment. Speeding the acceptance of new medical
technology will also reduce health care costs and improve patient treatment
options.
2. Background
Regulatory
System
Because
medical equipment directly impacts human lives, the Pharmaceuticals Law
regulates all aspects of the medical equipment industry, from manufacturing
and importing to post-marketing activities.
The standard processing period for obtaining approval for a
product is 12 months for new medical equipment—products that are
significantly different from previously approved products or those new in
indications, effects or uses. It
takes up to four months to gain approval for "me-too" medical
equipment—equipment that is essentially the same as equipment already on the
market. The Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Evaluation Center (PMDEC) of
the Ministry of Health and Welfare is the authority that makes equipment
approvals.
Approval
Procedures for New Products. PMDEC reviews applications for new
product approvals in consultation with the Central Pharmaceutical Affairs
Council. PMDEC then makes a final approval decision.
Approval
Procedures for “Me-Too” Products. For “me-too” equipment, PMDEC
forwards applications to the Japan Association for the Advanced Medical
Equipment (JAAME), the independent organization designated by the Japanese
government for investigating the equivalence of structures, usage,
indications, performance, etc. of “me-too” medical products.
After JAAME’s equivalency examination, PMDEC performs all other
necessary evaluations and then makes a final approval decision based on its
findings.
Non-approval
Products. MHW allows some new products to be sold without MHW approval.
Under the Pharmaceuticals Law, MHW is required to maintain a list of
products that do not need to obtain approval.
3. Analysis
Unnecessary
bureaucratic procedures for approving new medical equipment
The
Japanese regulatory system blocks medical equipment manufacturers from
obtaining product approvals in a timely manner. Currently it takes one year to
obtain approval for new products in Japan.
Approval procedures in the United States and most European countries
are significantly faster than in Japan.
One
reason why Japan’s approval process is long is that MHW lacks adequate
personnel to handle all approval applications quickly. Additionally, in the
case of "me-too" products, the review process is redundant. JAAME
reviews “me-too” applications to determine whether a product is equivalent
to other, already approved products. It then reports its results to PMDEC.
However, PMDEC sometimes rejects JAAME’s results and conducts its own
review.
MHW’s
Policy
Another problem with Japan’s regulatory system is MHW’s
reluctance to approve new medical products, especially high-risk
products used inside the human body. MHW didn’t approve the Implantable
Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) until it had been in use in other countries
for ten years, although the device was known to save $46,500 per patient and
to provide a better treatment option for many patients.
4. Proposed
Actions
On
behalf of its member companies, JMEA strongly encourages MHW to take action to
reduce the obstacles to introducing innovative, cost-effective new medical
equipment into the Japanese market. Specifically, JMEA urges MHW to take the
following actions without delay:
Ø
change
the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law to:
- shorten
the approval process for new products from one year to six months;
- prohibit
the redundant examination of “me-too”
products conducted by both JAAME and PMDEC;
- increase
the number of items that do not require MHW approval before being marketed;
Ø
increase
the number of personnel that review applications in JAAME and PMDEC; and
Ø
recognize
the benefits of advanced medical equipment.
Japan’s
population is aging rapidly. The
introduction of cost-effective and innovative medical equipment will be
crucial to containing health care expenditures and to provide for an
increasingly aged population.
Exhibit
2. Sample Letter to JMEA Members
Dear JMEA Members:
I am writing to ask for
your support for changing the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law. Under the current
law, it is difficult to introduce new medical equipment into the market.
Indeed, Japan’s approval process for medical equipment is longer than that
of any other major developed country. In today’s world of increasingly short
product life-cycles, quick approval for new products directly affects a
product’s profitability.
Japan’s market for
medical equipment is the second largest in the world.
The domestic demand for medical equipment was 2,028 billion yen in
1998. The value of the market is
expected to be 8,319 billion yen in 2025.
If the regulatory system were deregulated, the market would become even
larger.
JMEA is requesting that the Ministry of Health and
Welfare:
- change the Pharmaceutical Law in order to:
- shorten the approval period from one year to six months for new
products and four months to two month for “me-too” products;
- prohibit the redundant examination of “me-too” products
conducted by both the Japan Association for the Advanced Medical Equipment (JAAME)
and the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Evaluation Center (PMDEC);
- increase the number of medical products that do not require MHW
approval; and
- increase the number of JAAME and PMDEC personnel that review product
applications.
I hope all JMEA members will support this proposal.
Additionally, I ask that you respond to the questionnaire that will be sent to
you in ten days. The objective of
this questionnaire is to collect accurate information on how current
regulations negatively impact the medical equipment industry. Your honest answers will help to identify problems prevailing
in the regulatory system.
If you have questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
President of the Japan Medical Equipment Association
Exhibit
3. Sample Letter to Legislators
Dear Members of the Advisory Council on Social Security:
On behalf of Japan Medical Equipment Association (JMEA)
members, I am writing to request your support for changing the Pharmaceutical
Affairs Law. Under the current
law, it is difficult to introduce new medical equipment into the market. Yet
new, cost-effective medical technology can help reduce health care costs and
improve patient care—goals which are becoming increasingly important as
Japan’s population ages. The timely introduction of new medical equipment
will significantly reduce health care expenditures in the long run. Currently,
it takes longer to obtain approval for new medical equipment in Japan than in
any other major developed country.
As you know, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW)
estimates that over 25 percent of Japan’s population will be over the age of
65 by the year 2025. Japan’s health care expenditure and the ratio of this
expenditure to national income is already steadily increasing.
In 1999 the total medical expenditure was 30 trillion yen.
Estimates are that the total will reach 141 trillion yen in 2025.
The containment of the health care costs is a crucial
issue for building a sustainable and stable social welfare system for the
future. I understand that it is
for this reason that the Prime Minister established the Advisory Council on
Social Security to explore avenues for increasing efficiency within the
country’s health care system.
The containment of health care costs is JMEA’s goal, as
well as the Council’s. We hope that you will support our efforts to persuade
MHW to:
- change the Pharmaceutical Law in order to:
li>shorten the product approval process from one year to six months
for new products and from four months to two month for “me-too” products;
- prohibit the redundant examination of “me-too” products
conducted by both the Japan Association for the Advanced Medical Equipment (JAAME)
and the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Evaluation Center (PMDEC);
- increase the number of items on the list of medical products
that do not require MHW approval before being put on the market; and
- increase the number of JAAME and PMDEC personnel who review product
applications.
I am enclosing a report (see Appendix 9) that shows how
the rapid introduction of new medical equipment can reduce health care
expenditures and improve patient care. If you have questions, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
President of the Japan Medical Equipment Association
Exhibit
4. Sample Op-Ed Article
Access to Better, Cheaper
Medical Treatment
by the President of JMEA
Japan’s health
care expenditures are steadily increasing.
In 1999, the Japanese people spent over 30 trillion yen on health care
through taxes or other means. The
Ministry of Health and Welfare estimates that the expenditure will reach 141
trillion yen in 2025. By that time,
over 25 percent of the population will be over the age of 65.
In
order to satisfy the needs of Japan’s aging population—to both improve
treatment options and contain health care costs—Japan needs to recognize the
significance of advanced medical technology. Containing medical costs will also
be important to reducing Japan’s budget deficit.
Unfortunately, the Japanese people
cannot currently access cost-effective and innovative medical equipment quickly.
Under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, it regularly takes a full year to
gain approval of new medical technologies—approval that is required before
these technologies can be sold in Japan. While all countries regulate medical
products for public safety purposes, Japan’s application and approval process
for medical equipment is longer than that of any other major country, and part
of Japan’s system is redundant.
A recent study
showed how the Japanese government’s regulations waste health care resources
and impede treatment improvements for Japanese citizens. The Ministry of Health
and Welfare did not approve the Implantable
Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) until it had been in use in other countries for
ten 10 years—even though the device was projected to save 5.3 million yen
annually in health care expenditures and provides a better treatment option for
many patients.
In order to speed the introduction of innovative and
cost-effective medical equipment into the Japanese market, the Japan Medical
Equipment Association (JMEA) is encouraging the Ministry of Health and Welfare
to deregulate unnecessary bureaucratic procedures under the Pharmaceutical
Affairs Law. JMEA is asking the Ministry of Health and Welfare to shorten
the period for granting new product approvals.
Quick approval for new products will greatly improve access to cost-effective medical
treatment that will benefit all of us.
Exhibit
5. Schedule for Short-Run Strategy
May 8
Prepare for coalition building
May 20
Implement coalition building
- send letters
- phone calls
- meeetings
June 1
Distribute questionnaire (Deadline:
June 30)
Implement legislative strategy 1
(July 2000, G-8
Summit)
August 2000
Implement media strategy
September 2000
Implement legislative strategy 2
(October
2000, Election)
December 2000
Propose bill for amending the Pharmaceutical Law
Exhibit 6.
Budget for Short-Run Strategy (yen)
|
|
- develop questionnaire
- analysis
- report
|
| Lobbying Staff |
12,000,000 |
- one professional
- one assistant
|
750,000
450,000 |
| Coalition Building Expenses |
3,000,000 |
- letters
- meetings
- phone calls
|
|
| Computer System and Web Page |
1,000,000 |
|
Media |
0 |
| JMEA members |
- Class A (100)
- Class B (300)
- Class C (600)
- Class D (1,000)
|
6,000,000 (60,000 per company)
6,600,000 (22,000 per company)
6,600,000 (11,000 per company)
5,100,000 ( 5,100 per
company) |
REFERENCES
"A Report." Council on Health Insurance, 2000. Available from
http://www.mhw.go.jp/shingi/s0002/s0203-1_19.html.
"Bain Study Executive Summary." Health Industry Manufacturers
Association, 1997. Available from http://www.himanet.com/publicdocs/recommendations.htm.
"CASE STUDY: The Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)."
Health Industry Manufacturers Association, 1997. Available from http://www.himanet.com/publicdocs/icd.htm.
"Comments by the Health Industry Manufacturers Association on
Identification of Priority Practices." Health Industry Manufacturers
Association, 1999. Available from http://www.himanet.com/publicdocs/301watchlistpetition.html.
"Examples of Cost Efficient Technologies As Cited in the Bain
Study." Health Industry Manufacturers Association, 1997. Available from
http://www.himanet.com/publicdocs/bainexamples.htm.
"First Joint Status Report on the US-Japan Enhanced on Deregulation
and Competition Policy." Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 1998.
Available from http://www.mofa.go/region/n-america/us/economy/date/dereg9805.html.
"Fiscal Policy Speech by Minister of Finance, Kiichi Miyazawa, in
the 147th Session of the National Diet." Ministry of Finance
of Japan, 2000. Available from http://www.mof.go.jp/english/busget/e1b057.htm.
"Fiscal 2000 Priority Trade and Industry Policies." Ministry of
International Trade and Industry of Japan, 1999. Available from http://www.miti.go.jp/info-e/cIP9982e.html.
"GHTF Guiding Principles & Operating Procedures." Global
Harmonization Task Force, 1999. Available from http://www.ghtf.org/conferences/7thmeeting/outcomes/proced2.pdf.
"Gross Domestic Product, The First Preliminary Estimates."
Economic Planning Agency of Japan, 2000. Available from http://www.epa.go.jp/2000/g/qe994/jissuu.gif.
"Harmonization of the Product Quality System." JMEA News 19
(1998): 11.
"Industry Sector Analysis: Medical Device Market." Commercial
Service in Japan, 1999. Available from http://www.csjapan.doc.gov/isa99/medicaldevice.html.
"Introduction to JAAME" Japan Association for the Advanced
Medical Equipment. Available from http://www.jaame.or.jp/English/annai/annai.html.
Japan External Trade Organization. JETRO Japanese Market Report –
Regulations and Practices-: Medical Equipment. Tokyo: JETRO, 1998
Japan External Trade Organization. The Survey on Actual Conditions
Regarding Access to Japan – Medical Equipment. Tokyo: JETRO, 1996
Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare. Guide to Medical Device
Registration in Japan. Tokyo: Yakuji Nippo, Ltd., 1997.
Kawabuchi, Koichi. Introduction to Health Care Economics in Japan –
Understanding Japanese Health Care Reform –. Tokyo: Yakuji Nippo,
Ltd., 1998
Kawabuchi, Kouichi. Health Care Reform. Tokyo: Yakuji Nippo, Ltd.,
1998.
Kay, S. Wayne. "The plan for EHCR in the US." JAAME News 14
(1999): 5.
"Main Economic Indicators March 2000." Economic Planning Agency
of Japan, 2000. Available from http://www.epa.go.jp/geturei/2000mar-9.gif.
"Medical and Welfare Industries (in Japanese)." Ministry of
International Trade and Industry of Japan, 2000. Available from http://www.miti.go.jp/topic-j/e3275j.html.
"Medical Equipment." Japan External Trade Organization.
Available from http://www.jetro.go.jp/ip/e/access/medical.html.
"Medical Technology: Driving Efficiency, Not Costs, in Japan’s
Health Care System." Health Industry Manufacturers Association, 1997.
Available from http://www.himanet.com/publicdocs/drivinggefficiency.htm.
"Membership List of the Advisory Council on Social Security (in
Japanese)." Prime Minister’s Office, 2000. Available from http://www.sorifu.go.jp/hosho/meibo.html.
Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. Annual Statistics of
Pharmaceutical Industry’s Production Trends 1998. Tokyo: MHW, 1999.
"MOSS Agreement on Medical Equipment and Pharmaceuticals." ITA
of the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1986. Available from http://www.ita.doc.gov/region/japan/ta860109.html.
"National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers
1999." Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 1999. Available from
http://www.ustr.gov/reports/nte/1999/contents.html.
"Outlook of Industrial Standardization in Japan." Chiba
University. Available from http://www.hike.te.chiba-u-ac.jp/ikeda/JIS/what1.htm.
"Overview---FDA Modernization Act of 1997." U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, 1998. Available from http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice/371.html
"Policy Recommendations and Priority Requests to the Japanese
Government on the Promotion of Regulatory Reform." Keidanren, 2000.
Available from http://www.keidanren.or.jp/english/policy/2000/003.htm#part2.
"Policy Speech by Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori to the 147th
Session of the Diet." Prime Minister’s Official Residence of Japan,
2000. Available from http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/souri/mori/2000/0407policy.htm.
"Purpose of Study Group 1." Global Harmonization Task Force.
Available from http://www.ghtf.org/sg1/sg1.htm.
"Purpose of Study Group 2." Global Harmonization Task Force.
Available from http://www.ghtf.org/sg2/sg2.htm.
"Purpose of Study Group 3." Global Harmonization Task Force.
Available from http://www.ghtf.org/sg3/sg3.htm.
"Purpose of Study Group 4." Global Harmonization Task Force.
Available from http://www.ghtf.org/sg4/sg4.htm.
"Submission by the Government of the US to the Government of Japan
Regarding Deregulation, Competition Policy, and Transparency and Other
Governmental Practices in Japan." Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative, 1999. Available from http://www.ustr.gov/reports/tpa/1999/index.html.
Suzanami, Yoko, Shujiro Urata, and Hiroki Kawai. Measuring the Costa
of Protection in Japan. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International
Economics, 1995.
"The Summary of 1998 White Paper (in Japanese)." Ministry of
Health and Welfare of Japan, 1999. Available from http://www.mhw.go.jp/wp/wp99_4/chap-a3.html.
"The 43rd Meeting of the Committee on Deregulation (in
Japanese)." Prime Minister’s Office, 1996. Available from http://www.sorifu.go.jp/council/gyokaku/kanwa/43.html.
Umeda, Katu. "The reform of the insurance system." JAAME
News 13 (1999): 1.
"U.S. Industry recommendations for reducing Japan’s Health Care
Costs." Health Industry Manufacturers Association, 1997. Available from
http://www.himanet.com/publicdocs/recommendations.htm.
"White Paper: Section 2. The Medical Insurance System in
Transition." Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, 1996. Available
from http://www.mhw.go.jp/english/white_p/book1/p2_c3/c3_sect2.html.
top
|