|
POLICY AND POLITICS |
|
CD10 Outline Course Structure Index |
|
Goals The goal of this
course is to enable students to analyze the interaction of political and
economic influences in the development of policies affecting international
trade and investment, and to apply that knowledge in the formulation of
strategies designed to advance a country's or a firm's trade policy
interests. Students will learn how to evaluate the complex interactions
among and between governments and firms that characterize international
economic relations in the 1 990s, and develop an improved ability to
identify the critical policy elements that affect the international
competitive position of national industries. Topics Covered This course will
be organized around a series of questions. What is the role of states in
the global economic competition? Are multinational firms free actors in
the global economy? In what ways to they depend on the host countries in
which they invest their "global" operations? What can states do
to attract foreign direct investment? To what extent and in what ways can
multinational corporations be identified with the economies of the nations
in which they originated? The course will
examine these and other questions in the context of the three way rivalry
of the United States, Japan and Europe by comparing patterns of (1)
foreign direct investments, (2) intra-firm trading, (3) research and
development, (4) corporate governance, and (5) corporate finance of
multinational corporations originating in the United States, Germany, and
Japan. A preliminary
break out of class sessions and corresponding reading follows: Week l:
Political Economy and International Trade Week 2:
Multinational Corporate Behavior Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations, pp. 3‑24. Jeffry
Frieden and David Lake, eds. International Political Economy, 2d
edition, pp. 1 -16. Susan
Strange, States and Markets. Peter
Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets' pp. 17‑79 Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Karl
Polanyi, The Great Transformation. Robert
Gilpin, U. S. Power and the Multinational Corporation John
Dunning, Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. William
W. Keller, d al., Multinationals the Myth of Globalization (Princeton, N1:
Princeton University Press, forthcoming, 1997). World Investment Report
1994,
"Transnational
Corporations, Employment and the Workplace, Ch. 111: Globalization.
Integrated International Production and the World Economy, pp. 117-60.
"Everybody's Favorite Monsters: A Survey of Multinationals," The
Economist, Special Survey, March 27, 1993. Week 3 (Session A): Nationality and the
Multinational Corporation Robert
Reich, "Who Is Us? Harvard Business Review, January‑February,
1990. Laura
Tyson, "They Are Not Us: Why American Ownership Still Matters," The American
Prospect, 1991,
pp. 37-49. Stephen
Thomsen, "We Are All 'Us'," The Columbia Journal of World
Business (Winter) 1992, pp. 6-14. Lorraine
Eden and Mareen Molot, "Insiders and Outsiders. Defining 'Who Is user
in the North American Auto Industry," Transnational Corporations Vol.
2, No. 3 (December), 1993, pp. 31‑64. Week 3 (Session B): Competing Firms or
Competing States? Paul
Krugman, "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession," Foreign
Affairs' March-April, 1994. James
Fallows, Looking at the Sun. Lester
Thurow, Head-To-Head. Susan
Strange, Rival States, Rival Finns . Laura
Tyson, Who's Bashing Whom? Week 4: States, Firms, and "Global"
Technology Innovation Alfred
Chandler, "Technological and Organizational Underpinnings of Modern John
Dunning, Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Ch. 11, "MNE,
“Technology and Innovatory Capacity: A Host Country
Perspective," pp. 287-330; and Ch. 12, "MNE, Technology
and Innovatory Capacity: A Home Country Perspective," pp. 33148. Case Material Materials will
be developed to examine several of the following situations. ·
Japanese auto transplants in the United States. ·
Foreign corporate participation in the Advanced Technology
Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce. ·
Cases of U.S. FDI in East Asia, and of East Asian FDI in the
United States. · A case involving government subsidy of an industry of national importance: Sematech or Airbus. Criteria
for Evaluating Teaching and Student Performance Students should have mastered and be able evaluate the key concepts surrounding international economic relations. In addition, students should be able to demonstrate an understanding of the differences associated with multinational firms originating in Europe, Asia, and North America. They should also be able to associate those differences with the different policy, cultural, and financial environments of different regions of the global economy.
|
| SYLLABUS |
| Course Structure Index |